Skip to main content

Jochen Zeischka

Corryong Cup 2025 · Task 1 (Open) (Sun, 5 Jan 2025) · open · ranked #2 · times in Australia/Melbourne (GMT+11)

Scores computed

Made goal in 1:07:16 — 864.3 points

Loading map...

The flight

What the tracklog shows, and which crossings scored.

How this works

Crossed the start cylinder boundary 3 times. The scored start is the latest crossing from which the flight still makes its best run along the course — re-starting supersedes an earlier start, while simply flying back through the cylinder later in the task changes nothing.
The 13:50:01 crossing is the scored start. By the 14:52:27 crossing the flight had already reached TP6 (TOWONG), so treating that as a re-start would mean flying the course again from there — a shorter, later run that scores less.
Start time taken: gate 2 of 4 — the last start gate at or before the crossing. The speed-section clock runs from the gate, not from the crossing (FAI S7F §8.3.1).13:50:00
Completed the task — full task distance is credited.

Day quality — points on offer

Task validity 90.17% of a perfect day, so 901.7 of 1000 points were available.

How this works

Launch validity — the day counts for less if much of the field never got into the air.100%

55 pilots flew out of 55 present. Nominal launch is 96%, so launch validity is full once 53 pilots are in the air.

Distance validity — the day counts for less if the field as a whole did not get far.100%

Measured against a 35.0 km nominal distance, a 30% nominal goal and a 5.0 km minimum distance. The field flew 28.3 km past the minimum on average, with a best of 50.4 km.

How far the field got — the spread distance validity is computed from, one dot per pilot. 55 pilots flew; you flew 50.4 km, further than 30 of them. The day averaged 28.3 km past the 5.0 km minimum, against a 35.0 km nominal distance.
Time validity — the day counts for less if the fastest pilot got round much quicker than the task was meant to take.90.17%

The fastest pilot took 1:03:47 against a nominal task time of 1:30:00 — 70.9% of nominal.

Points on offer for the day901.7 pts

1000 × 1.00 × 1.00 × 0.9017 = 901.7

Split between the components: 25 of 55 pilots made goal — a goal ratio of 0.45

distance 398.5 · time 352.2 · leading 88.1 · arrival 62.9

The share each component takes of the day

distance 44.2% · time 39.1% · leading 9.8% · arrival 7.0%

Distance points

398.5 of 398.5 pts

Full distance — one of 25 pilots in goal

How this works

Task distance50.4 km

The optimized task line — the shortest legal way round the turnpoints.

Scored distance50.4 km

Measured along the optimized task line, up to the furthest point on course.

Best distance in class50.4 km
Made goal — full available distance points.398.5 pts
The curve is the distance-points formula, half of it built from where the field landed out (FAI S7F §11.1.1) — every dot is a pilot, sitting exactly on it. Its steepest stretches are the ones fewest pilots got past, so flying through one is worth more than the same distance somewhere easy. You flew 50.4 km of the class best 50.4 km, worth 398.5 of 398.5.

Time points

320.1 of 352.2 pts

3rd fastest of 25 through the speed section

How this works

Time points use the 5⁄6 speed-fraction exponent (the current FAI S7F, S7F §11.2).
Your speed section time1:07:16

Timed from your 13:50:00 start gate to the end of the speed section (FAI S7F §8.7) — you crossed the start at 13:50:01.

Fastest time in class1:03:47

Set by Jon Durand — you were 3:29 behind.

Time points fall off with the gap to the fastest time320.1 pts

speed fraction = max(0, 1 − ((T − Tbest) ÷ √Tbest)^5⁄6) = 0.909; × 352.2 available = 320.1 (times in hours)

The curve is the time-points formula — every dot is a pilot, sitting exactly on it. You were 3:29 behind the fastest time, which cost 32.1 of the 352.2 time points on offer.

Leading points

88.1 of 88.1 pts

Best of 53 measured leading coefficients

How this works

Leading points reward flying out front during the speed section — the pilot with the best leading coefficient takes all available leading points, others fall off with the gap.88.1 pts
Your leading coefficient — the area under your distance-over-time curve, so lower means further ahead for longer1.6

The best in the class — no one spent more of the race out front, so this takes the full available leading points.

Measured with the classic squared-distance leading coefficient (S7F §11.3.1, the hang-gliding / GAP2016–2018 variant).
The curve is the leading-points formula — every dot is a pilot, sitting exactly on it. You hold the best coefficient in the class, so you take all 88.1 leading points.

Arrival points

57.6 of 62.9 pts

2nd of 25 to the end of the speed section

How this works

Arrival points reward crossing the end of the speed section early relative to the other pilots who reached it.57.6 pts
Reached the end of the speed section 2nd of 2514:57:16

The arrival order is by the clock at the end of the speed section, not by speed — an earlier start gate can put a slower pilot ahead of a faster one here.

Arrival points fall off steeply with each place57.6 pts

arrival ratio = 1 − (2 − 1) ÷ 25 = 0.96; arrival factor = 0.2 + 0.037·r + 0.13·r² + 0.633·r³ = 0.915; × 62.9 available = 57.6

One place earlier would have been worth 5.3 more points

The curve is front-loaded: first place takes all 62.9 available, and everyone else who reaches the end of the speed section keeps at least 12.7 of them.

The curve is the arrival-points formula — every dot is a pilot, sitting exactly on it. You arrived 2 of 25, worth 57.6 of 62.9 — one place earlier would have been 5.3 more. The order is by the clock at the end of the speed section, not by speed.

Total

864.3 of 901.7 pts

How this works

Distance + time + leading + arrival, minus penalties864.3 pts

round(398.5 + 320.1 + 88.1 + 57.6, 1 dp) = 864.3

Where the points went

Your 864.3 against the 876.3 that won the class.

How this works

Distancelevel

you 398.5, the leader 398.5

Time−9.5 pts

you 320.1, the leader 329.6

Leading+2.9 pts

you 88.1, the leader 85.2

Arrival−5.3 pts

you 57.6, the leader 62.9

Behind Gordon Rigg−12 pts

Most of the gap — 9.5 of 12 points — is time-points.