Skip to main content

Ward Gunn

Corryong Cup 2017 · Task 4 (Open) (Sat, 14 Jan 2017) · open · ranked #12 · times in Australia/Melbourne (GMT+11)

Scores computed

Made goal in 1:18:39 — 265.6 points

Loading map...

Check this tracklog

Flagged
  • Track shows no sign of flight

    Nothing in this track looks like flying: the best sustained climb is 0.72 m/s over 120 s (a glider does 1.5 m/s), and the best sustained glide sinks 0.79 m/s at a minimum ground speed of 0.2 m/s with 87% straightness. That is the profile of a vehicle — a vario left recording the drive to launch — rather than a flight.

How track validity checks work

The flight

What the tracklog shows, and which crossings scored.

How this works

Crossed the start cylinder boundary 7 times. The scored start is the latest crossing from which the flight still makes its best run along the course — re-starting supersedes an earlier start, while simply flying back through the cylinder later in the task changes nothing.
The 14:15:15 crossing is the scored start. By the 14:47:16 crossing the flight had already reached TP2 (KANGCK), so treating that as a re-start would mean flying the course again from there — a shorter, later run that scores less.
Completed the task — full task distance is credited.

Day quality — points on offer

Task validity 44.71% of a perfect day, so 447.1 of 1000 points were available.

How this works

Launch validity — the day counts for less if much of the field never got into the air.100%

26 pilots flew out of 26 present. Nominal launch is 96%, so launch validity is full once 25 pilots are in the air.

Distance validity — the day counts for less if the field as a whole did not get far.60.45%

Measured against a 50.0 km nominal distance, a 20% nominal goal and a 5.0 km minimum distance. The field flew 16.3 km past the minimum on average, with a best of 28.1 km.

How far the field got — the spread distance validity is computed from, one dot per pilot. 26 pilots flew; you flew 28.1 km, further than 14 of them. The day averaged 16.3 km past the 5.0 km minimum, against a 50.0 km nominal distance.
Time validity — the day counts for less if the fastest pilot got round much quicker than the task was meant to take.73.97%

The fastest pilot took 46:45 against a nominal task time of 1:30:00 — 52% of nominal.

Points on offer for the day447.1 pts

1000 × 1.00 × 0.6045 × 0.7397 = 447.1

Split between the components: 12 of 26 pilots made goal — a goal ratio of 0.46

distance 196.2 · time 219.6 · arrival 31.4

The share each component takes of the day

distance 43.9% · time 49.1% · arrival 7.0%

Distance points

196.2 of 196.2 pts

Full distance — one of 12 pilots in goal

How this works

Task distance28.1 km

The optimized task line — the shortest legal way round the turnpoints.

Scored distance28.1 km

Measured along the optimized task line, up to the furthest point on course.

Best distance in class28.1 km
Made goal — full available distance points.196.2 pts
The curve is the distance-points formula, half of it built from where the field landed out (FAI S7F §11.1.1) — every dot is a pilot, sitting exactly on it. Its steepest stretches are the ones fewest pilots got past, so flying through one is worth more than the same distance somewhere easy. You flew 28.1 km of the class best 28.1 km, worth 196.2 of 196.2.

Time points

63 of 219.6 pts

12th fastest of 12 through the speed section

How this works

Time points use the 2⁄3 speed-fraction exponent (the older GAP2016/2018 curve, S7F §11.2).
Your speed section time1:18:39
Fastest time in class46:45

Set by Hughbert Alexander — you were 31:54 behind.

Time points fall off with the gap to the fastest time63 pts

speed fraction = max(0, 1 − ((T − Tbest) ÷ √Tbest)^2⁄3) = 0.287; × 219.6 available = 63 (times in hours)

The curve is the time-points formula — every dot is a pilot, sitting exactly on it. You were 31:54 behind the fastest time, which cost 156.6 of the 219.6 time points on offer.

Arrival points

6.4 of 31.4 pts

12th of 12 to the end of the speed section

How this works

Arrival points reward crossing the end of the speed section early relative to the other pilots who reached it.6.4 pts
Reached the end of the speed section 12th of 1215:33:55

The arrival order is by the clock at the end of the speed section, not by speed — an earlier start gate can put a slower pilot ahead of a faster one here.

Arrival points fall off steeply with each place6.4 pts

arrival ratio = 1 − (12 − 1) ÷ 12 = 0.083; arrival factor = 0.2 + 0.037·r + 0.13·r² + 0.633·r³ = 0.204; × 31.4 available = 6.4

One place earlier would have been worth 0.3 more points

The curve is front-loaded: first place takes all 31.4 available, and everyone else who reaches the end of the speed section keeps at least 6.4 of them.

The curve is the arrival-points formula — every dot is a pilot, sitting exactly on it. You arrived 12 of 12, worth 6.4 of 31.4 — one place earlier would have been 0.3 more. The order is by the clock at the end of the speed section, not by speed.

Total

265.6 of 447.1 pts

How this works

Distance + time + leading + arrival, minus penalties265.6 pts

round(196.2 + 63.0 + 6.4, 1 dp) = 265.6

Where the points went

Your 265.6 against the 441.8 that won the class.

How this works

Distancelevel

you 196.2, the leader 196.2

Time−156.6 pts

you 63, the leader 219.6

Arrival−19.7 pts

you 6.4, the leader 26.1

Behind Hughbert Alexander−176.2 pts

Most of the gap — 156.6 of 176.2 points — is time-points.